cesar milan

From Cesar Milan and Balance.


Are Common Core proponents “unbalanced pack leaders” and dictators?  Common Core has been adopted and implemented (more in some places than others) for four years.  It was rolled out with little public fanfare or knowledge.  Legislators were largely unaware that private organizations financially helped by the US Department of Education had crafted plans that would take away  states’ ability to develop/deliver their unique standards and assessments.  Legislators were also unaware that the CCSS Initiative includes accountability measures and data mining creating huge unfunded debt for the state and local districts.

“Unbalanced”-leading by intimidation or coercion-is an appropriate adjective for this initiative.  Bill Gates and other proponents have had to create yet another PR group to inform the “misguided and misinformed” how the Initiative is good for us.  The USDOEd threatens to pull NCLB waivers if  CCSS Initiatives are not implemented in the manner the USDOEd thinks is appropriate.  The “Mikes” (Michaels Petrilli and Brickman) of Fordham appear on radio interviews, state legislatures and panels telling us how they are really state led, voluntary and how the world will end for state education and students if states are to return to their previous standards.  They’ve tasted the initiative cereal offered by American Diploma Project (Fordham was part of standards writing in the 1990s), NGA and CCSSO.  They like it!     Remember this?


He likes it!  Ask Mikey!

Now think of Life Cereal as being the CCSSI.


Taxpayers and legislators want “balanced pack leaders” in their local districts to direct and develop educational policies that are tailored for their specific population. We aren’t getting it with the current pack leaders of educational reform: Gates, Arne Duncan, Fordham, Governors, State Educational Agency Leaders, Chambers of Commerce, etc.   It’s a dictatorial education reform plan and is not representative government at work. We don’t need nor believe slick advertisements from these individuals/groups when their claims are simply not true.  We’ve done our own research and know this is false advertising.  Why should we buy this product?  Oh, that’s right.  We (the taxpayers and legislators) didn’t.  Our unbalanced pack leaders (governors, education commissioners, state board of education members) signed us up without even asking us.  The other unbalanced pack leaders of the reform then step in and try to talk us into accepting these unconstitutional  mandates with no research/data to back up their theories.

What should our response be when we are faced with these unbalanced leaders and their reforms?  Milan writes: Dog packs do not have dictators. If the alpha dog in a pack tries to enforce the rules through intimidation and coercion, the other dogs in the pack will kill him or drive him out.

I vote to drive the alpha dogs out and find balanced pack leaders in our local districts and states: balanced pack leaders do not need intimidation or coercion. They inspire the pack to follow them through calm, assertive energy.  Enough of these leaders who know little to nothing about actually teaching children and are advertising the Common Core States Standards Initiative for a public buy-in.  There is a truth in advertising law from the FTC.  Maybe we should contact that Federal Agency for an investigation into the proponents’ CCSSI claims:


When consumers see or hear an advertisement, whether it’s on the Internet, radio or television, or anywhere else, federal law says that ad must be truthful, not misleading, and, when appropriate, backed by scientific evidence. The Federal Trade Commission enforces these truth-in-advertising laws, and it applies the same standards no matter where an ad appears – in newspapers and magazines, online, in the mail, or on billboards or buses. The FTC looks especially closely at advertising claims that can affect consumers’ health or their pocketbooks – claims about food, over-the-counter drugs, dietary supplements, alcohol, and tobacco and on conduct related to high-tech products and the Internet, such as the dissemination of spyware. The FTC also monitors and writes reports about ad industry practices regarding marketing of food, violent movies, music, and electronic games to children.




Gretchen Logue

Share and Enjoy !

0 0